2018 lights up as the year the U.S. could be in line for a downgrade if Congressional Budget Office projections hold.

Spiraling debt is Uncle Sam’s shock collar, and its jolt may await like an invisible pet fence.

"Nobody knows when you bump up against the limit, but you know when it happens it will really hurt," said fiscal watchdog Maya MacGuineas of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

The great uncertainty about how much debt is too much has tended to make fiscal discipline seem less urgent, rather than more. There is no obvious threshold beyond which investors will demand higher real yields for holding U.S. debt. Vague warnings from ratings agencies about the loss of America’s ‘AAA’ status haven’t added much clarity — until recently.

In the wake of the financial crisis and recession, Moody’s Investors Service has brought new transparency to its sovereign ratings analysis — so much so that 2018 lights up as the year the U.S. could be in line for a downgrade if Congressional Budget Office projections hold.

The key data point in Moody’s view is the size of federal interest payments on the public debt as a percentage of tax revenue. For the U.S., debt service of 18%-20% of federal revenue is the outer limit of AAA-territory, Moody’s managing director Pierre Cailleteau confirmed in an e-mail.

Under the Obama budget, interest would top 18% of revenue in 2018 and 20% in 2020, CBO projects.

But under more adverse scenarios than the CBO considered, including higher interest rates, Moody’s projects that debt service could hit 22.4% of revenue by 2013.

"While we see limited risk of a U.S. sovereign debt downgrade in the next 2-3 years, beyond that we cannot be so certain," wrote Societe Generale’s economics team in a recent report.

The Moody’s ratings framework is one that could have a significant influence on policy — particularly in a crisis.

Because debt levels and interest rates can’t be lowered overnight, the obvious way of staying within the AAA limits set by Moody’s would be to raise revenue.

"It would bias the remedy in favor of tax increases for countries that want to improve their bond rating," said Brian Riedl, budget analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation.

Because economic growth is a key to fiscal health, Riedl argues that a ratings agency concerned about whether bondholders are repaid should bias spending cuts over tax increases.

Moody’s says that its framework focuses on debt affordability rather than debt levels as a percentage of GDP. "The higher this ratio (interest/revenue), the more public debt constrains the formulation and delivery of other policies," Moody’s analysts wrote in March.

As implied by the adverse scenario, a financial market shock from higher interest rates could precede the threat of a downgrade. In other words, investors might be less forgiving of U.S. fiscal policy than Moody’s.

For instance, markets began pricing in a Greek default as a real possibility well before Standard & Poor’s downgraded that nation’s debt rating to junk last week.

Brian Bethune, chief U.S. financial economist at IHS Global Insight, says "the occasional missives about this problem (from ratings agencies) could put some pressure on rates" in advance of any ratings change.

Bethune is among economists who see CBO projections as "wishful thinking."

The budget scorekeeper’s outlook assumes discretionary spending restraint, broad-based tax hikes and well-behaved interest rates. Nevertheless, it sees debt reaching 90% of GDP in 2020, up from 53% at the end of 2009.

In the new Milken Institute Review, Len Burman, former director of the Tax Policy Center and now a professor at Syracuse University, calls CBO projections "wildly optimistic."

"They presuppose that interest rates on government securities will remain historically low, and that the economy will grow at a historically healthy clip," Burman wrote.

Treasury yields have been dropping in recent weeks as investors seek safety amid Europe’s growing financial crisis, but some see risks emerging.

"The Chinese have been big buyers" of Treasuries but are no longer running surpluses, said Societe Generale senior U.S. economist Aneta Markowska. "They just don’t have the marginal dollars to recycle back into the Treasury market," she said.

This entry was posted in News and politics. Bookmark the permalink.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s